Local champion...
(It is my usual “lame” excuse not to be more active on this blog)
Anyhow, to come back on the subject of interest here, the message I wanted to give and discussed is this one.
A part from some noticeable exceptions (e.g. truly born-global start-ups; e-bay sellers; companies coming from tiny countries; etc.), time and time again I have noticed that many entrepreneurs in the region focusing toward international market (because it is more lucrative) and failing to breakthrough, often, at the expense of the survival and local development of the business.
The two main reasons I have identified so far are:
- Lack of proper internationalization process
- And lack of competitiveness!
Internationalization processes are multiples but they do require to be planned and properly executed to be sustainable otherwise successes are often more due to luck than anything else. Luck is OK and even welcome but it is not sustainable!
But the biggest trouble is not an immature internationalization process but the lack of competitiveness. Companies jump-start their international business often before to know if they are competitive locally. It is however highly unlikely that the global markets will be less competitive than the company own local market. In turns it means that even if the international process has been well prepared and executed, it will most likely fail because of the lack of competitiveness.


1 Comments:
Lauren,
You are most definitely right about succeeding in the local market first - in general terms. I'd like to reflect on a couple of points here:
1. I do imagine situations where the rule about succeeding in the home market first cannot be easily applied.
Let's take the class of businesses that can be loosely categorized as Web2.0 businesses - say, Flickr, 43things or any other startups with business models relying on social networking, user generated content and a combination of advertising and subscription revenues, where scale is imperative.
While such businesses can be perfectly envisioned and designed by entrepreneurs in small countries, be it Estonia, Lithuania or Albania, in most cases they are not feasible if launched only in the home markets due to the limited size of the potential user audience.
Apart from problems with understanding the cultural differences between the local market and the global one (which are becoming less prominent as nowadays many young entrepreneurs are spending more time reading global media and american or japanese VC blogs than studying local newspapers), I don't see any major obstacles that would prevent emergence of such new businesses in small markets. Many of these rely on word of mouth rather than conventional (=expensive) marketing, and can benefit from utilizing relatively cheap local labor force in developing the necessary technologies (website engines, databases, etc.). They don't require any significant financial investments either, at least in the initial phases of development (think Flickr which was conceived as a family business).
While all this looks OK in theory, I'm yet to discover any such businesses or services designed for global market and successfully launched by CEE entrepreneurs (or, for that matter, by entrepreneours from any other small countries or regions).
Even in cases where such web2.0 businesses (forgive me for the lame labeling, but I just can't think of a better way to name those) actually did succeed in their home markets despite their small size (think the runaway success of draugiem.lv social network in Latvia), they seem to fail when exported to the neighbouring countries (the above mentioned dominant Latvian social network has started its operations in Lithuania over a year ago, but seems to have be lacking any kind of traction so far).
I can already hear Estonians screaming 'Skype' and 'Kazaa' - but to my mind those two were very much different, being conceived and run by Scandinavian founders/managers and backed by Western VC funds. Skype benefited from Estonian brains - and intentionally positioned itself as an Estonian startup, perhaps seeking a cooler 'renegade from the wild lands' image, but it was just a well run outsourced operation, while the strategic thinking was done elsewhere (do correct me if I'm wrong).
Then again it might be a problem with Europe as a whole - haven't heard of any German or French-developed global Web2.0 services as well; all the massively successful startups such as delicio.us, mySpace, or Flickr seem to come from the States.
Oh wait. Russians do have AllOfMP3.com - the barely legal online music store which is currently getting more customers than Rhapsody or the legalized Napster. But 80 percent of their international success comes from the dirt cheap pricing and the safety of their jurisdiction; with the remaining 20 percent perhaps attributable to their ingeniously user friendly interface and solid technical infrastructure.
But that is the only case of a CEE-born global web business I can remember right now. Do you know any others?
2. For more conventional tech businesses, certainly going global before succeeding locally is frequently suicidal. I started my own first company in Lithuania back in 1998 and had business plans for rapid expansion accross CEE ready as early as 2000, but luckily those were shelved at the time as we realized we wouldn't be able to manage all the complexity of international expansion.
Having built a solid and financially stable business in the home market, we have now expanded into Latvia and are eyeing other neighbouring countries again - but as far as I can tell until now our own international expansion has been fueled by international expansion of our major clients: basically, we have been following them outside of Lithuania rather than launching foreign subsidiaries without any initial revenue base. The risks have therefore been minimal.
We have another [consulting] company that is doing fairly well in Lithuania and could in theory be able to export its services to Latvia, Kaliningrad or Belarus, but again we are taking the way of growing a rock-solid business locally before embarking on any kind of international expansion (though my heart is bleeding, as it is clear to me that once we reach maturity domestically, other players will have emerged in those other countries and entering those markets will be a much harder challenge).
Sorry for the long script - this is probably a sign that the ideas I'm trying to share have not been properly digested by myself yet.
By
skyliner1998, at 26 May, 2006 15:20
Post a Comment
<< Home